Justice Secretary Menardo Guevarra made the disclosure on Wednesday, but declined to provide details of the ongoing discussion.
Guevarra also said the government panel would sit down next with the other big water utility firm, Maynilad, also on the proposed amendments to their existing concession agreement.
“The review panel is currently discussing the draft revised water concession agreement with Manila Water. We will sit down with Maynilad soon thereafter,” Guevarra said, in a text message to reporters.
The DOJ chief would not say when the discussion actually started and when it is expected to be finished, but expressed optimism that the revised contracts would be amenable to all parties.
“Sorry, no further details at this time. Suffice it to say that the revised water concession agreement is a great improvement over the original agreement, as it does away with the onerous provisions of the latter, without making the concession less economically viable ,” Guevarra stressed.
Last November, President Duterte gave the DOJ the go-signal to sit down with the two water concessionaires for the proposed revision of their existing contracts.
Guevarra earlier said among the provisions in the existing concession agreements that would have to go are the non-interference in the rate-setting mechanism of the two water firms and the Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS) and its twin provisions on indemnification arising from such government interference.
Duterte ordered the DOJ to review the concession agreements after discovering onerous provisions in the existing contracts, and after the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in Singapore issued a decision stating the Philippine government should pay P7.4 billion to Manila Water and P3.4 billion to Maynilad for the losses they suffered from unenforced water rate hike.
The President criticized both Manila Water and Maynilad and threatened to file a case of economic sabotage against the two water firms due to the “onerous” 1997 contracts with the government.
Last December, the drafting committee composed of representatives from the Office of the President, Department of Finance, DOJ, Office of the Solicitor General and Office of Government Corporate Counsel came up with a draft based on the terms approved by the review committee.
The draft was then forwarded to the secretaries and the review committee for approval.
COMMENT DISCLAIMER: Reader comments posted on this Web site are not in any way endorsed by Manila Standard. Comments are views by manilastandard.net readers who exercise their right to free expression and they do not necessarily represent or reflect the position or viewpoint of manilastandard.net. While reserving this publication’s right to delete comments that are deemed offensive, indecent or inconsistent with Manila Standard editorial standards, Manila Standard may not be held liable for any false information posted by readers in this comments section.