The oral arguments have been rescheduled on Feb. 2 at 2:30 p.m.
The high court said the Solicitor General had requested the resetting of the oral arguments because his assistant solicitor-general and some staff who would be attending the debate had tested positive for COVID-19.
The high court had announced last year that the oral arguments would be set on the third week of September “at the earliest,” but Calida sought the cancellation of the oral arguments and moved that all the parties be allowed to instead submit memorandums.
And in November last year the high court set the oral arguments on Jan. 19.
The tribunal had already issued an advisory requiring all non-employees, including members of the media who will personally be at the high court on Jan. 19, to present a negative swab test result taken within 72 hours before the oral arguments.
The anti-terrorism law is considered one of the most contested laws to reach the Supreme Court, with 37 petitions filed not only by advocacy groups, human rights lawyers and legal experts but also by retired Supreme Court justices and constitutionalists.
COMMENT DISCLAIMER: Reader comments posted on this Web site are not in any way endorsed by Manila Standard. Comments are views by manilastandard.net readers who exercise their right to free expression and they do not necessarily represent or reflect the position or viewpoint of manilastandard.net. While reserving this publication’s right to delete comments that are deemed offensive, indecent or inconsistent with Manila Standard editorial standards, Manila Standard may not be held liable for any false information posted by readers in this comments section.