The head of Russia’s Direct Investment Fund (RDIF) Kirill Dmitriev said in a statement that his organisation had secured agreements with companies from Italy, Spain, France, and Germany.
Dmitriev said the deals would allow for the supply of Sputnik to the European market “once the approval is granted by the European Medicines Agency (EMA)”.
If approved Sputnik would become the first non-Western coronavirus jab to be certified for use across the 27-nation bloc.
A spokesman for the Italian-Russian Chamber of Commerce said last week that pharmaceutical company Adienne would produce Sputnik at factories in northern Italy starting in July.
In France, however, the economy ministry told AFP on Monday that it was unaware of any deal between RDIF and French firms.
The Spanish health ministry said it did not have any information regarding the formalisation of any contract in the country.
Germany’s health ministry said last month that German pharmaceutical company IDT Biologika was in talks with Russia over production of Sputnik.
But an IDT Biologika spokesman told AFP if there was an agreement already signed with a German company, it was someone else, as the two sides do not have a firm deal yet and are “still at the talks stage”.
The EMA launched a rolling review of Sputnik V earlier this month, but several EU countries have already begun distributing it.
Hungary approved Sputnik V in February and began using it as part of its vaccine rollout, while the Czech Republic and Slovakia have also ordered doses and say they will not wait for EMA approval.
According to the vaccine’s developers, Sputnik V has been registered in more than 50 countries.
Russia registered Sputnik V last August ahead of large-scale clinical trials, sparking concern among some experts at home and abroad over the fast-track process.
Leading medical journal The Lancet last month published results showing the jab to be safe and over 90 percent effective.
The RDIF said Monday that 3.5 million people in Russia have received both doses of Sputnik V.
COMMENT DISCLAIMER: Reader comments posted on this Web site are not in any way endorsed by Manila Standard. Comments are views by manilastandard.net readers who exercise their right to free expression and they do not necessarily represent or reflect the position or viewpoint of manilastandard.net. While reserving this publication’s right to delete comments that are deemed offensive, indecent or inconsistent with Manila Standard editorial standards, Manila Standard may not be held liable for any false information posted by readers in this comments section.